Sunday, November 17, 2019
Philosophy Trinity Essay Example for Free
Philosophy Trinity Essay Many philosophers have addressed and questioned the subject regarding the unity and trinity of God. Yahya Ibn Adi was a philosopher and a Monophysite scholar of the Arab Classical Period who has firmly given treatises of his own interpretation on this subject. This has caused manygfjkfgmngcccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccb scholars and other philosophers to critique his understandings and express their own viewpoints of Yahyah Ibn Adiââ¬â¢s philosophy on the unity and trinity of God. Emilio Platti in his article Yahya B. Adi And His Refutation Of Al-Warraqââ¬â¢s Treatise On The Trinity In Relation To His Other Works and Sidney H. Griffith in her article Commending Virtue And A Humane Polity In 10th Century Baghdad The Vision of Yahya Ibn Adi are two scholars who explored Yahyaââ¬â¢s refutations. In their articles they discuss b a good indication to what Yahyaââ¬â¢s belief was on the subject of unity of God. Many philosophers challenged his standpoints on the unity as well as the trinity resulting in Yahya to refute the situation. Two philosophers in particular who attributed Yahyaââ¬â¢s treatises were Al-Kindi and and Al-Warraq. One of Al-Kindiââ¬â¢s reasoning for attributing Yahyaââ¬â¢s treatise on the unity and trinity of vb the unity of God. Griffith explains how Yahya firmly asserts that ââ¬Å" God is said to be ââ¬Ëoneââ¬â¢ in number in reference to his ââ¬Ësubstance, while in reference to his ââ¬Ëquiddityââ¬â¢ or whatnessââ¬â¢, which, according to Yahya, is essentially described as being ââ¬Ëgenerous/good, ââ¬Ëwiseââ¬â¢, and ââ¬Ëpowerefulââ¬â¢, he is ââ¬Ëthreeââ¬â¢Ã¢â¬ 4 In comparison with Griffithââ¬â¢s article, Emilio Pratti critiques how Yahya refutes to Al-Kindiââ¬â¢s attribution on treatise on the unity. Pratti believed that ââ¬Å"To al Kindi, he underlies that the Christians say on the one hand, that the Creator is one, and that his quiddity is one, but they also say, on the other hand, that He is three, as far as He is good, wise and powerful.. â⬠5 Pratti stresses that this is not a contradiction because we can use ââ¬Å"oneâ⬠in the sense of one in subject and many in definition. In Prattiââ¬â¢s conclusion, he raises the questions ââ¬Å"b in different ways, based on what the Scriptures are saying to them? Why should God not be present in a human being, as we understand it from the Gospels? â⬠Pratti closes his argument insisting that there is no indication that this would be impossible, he believes there are many indications that God can certainly expose himself as such Emilio Plattiââ¬â¢s argued that when it came to Yahyaââ¬â¢s refutations, he found his ideas to be offered in an unorganized and sometimes contradictory way. Platti also scolds how certain arguments by Yahya Ibn Adiââ¬â¢s may be given in a particular reply. In regards to how Yahya Ibn Adi responds to those who challenge his treatise, Pratti states that ââ¬Å"â⬠¦most of his apologetical works are written in the form of a rebuttal; he quotes, most probably in extensor, an already existing refutation of the Christians by a Muslim-or a refutation of the Jacobites by a Nesotrian ââ¬â and replies paragraph by paragraphâ⬠(173) Pratti argues that this way of responding has several consequences. vcghaks about how Yahya replies to the philosopher Al-Kindiââ¬â¢s treatise on the unity. To al Kindi, he underlies that the Christians say on the one hand, that the Creator is one, and that his quiddity is one, but they also say, on the other hand, that He is three, as far as He is good, wise and powerfulâ⬠¦.. Pratti asserts that this is not a contradiction for we Pratti raises the questions ââ¬Å"Why should God not reveal Himself under the three aspects of his hypostases, designated by the Christians in different ways, based on what the Scriptures are saying to them? Why should God not be present in a human being, as we understand it from the Gospels? â⬠Pratti concludes that there is no indication that this would be impossible, he believes there are many indications that God can certainly expose himself as such. Sidney H. Griffith discusses how Yahya refutes back to Al-Kindiâ⬠¦Griffith says ââ¬Å"yahya ibn adiââ¬â¢s habit of quoting large portions of the texts of those with whose ideas he disagrees in his refutations of them that a significant portion of the lost work of an important comparative religionist in the early Islamic period, Abu Isa al-Warraq has survived, allowing a modern editor to bring out an edition of what he considers to be the major part of Abu Isaââ¬â¢s anti-Christian work. Griffith describes Yahya Ibn Adiââ¬â¢s unity of God to be.. Griffith describes how Yahyah Ibn Adi wrote a handful of apologetic texts of his own in the Kalam style defending the doctrine of Trinity. Griffith describes . yahya argues Al-Kindi challenged Yahyah Ibn Adiââ¬â¢s treatise as well. Yahyaââ¬â¢s rebuttle was that ââ¬Å"given the Muslim philosopherââ¬â¢s own description of God as simultaneously God as ââ¬Ëoneââ¬â¢ and as ââ¬Ësubstance, al-Kindi too faced a logical conundrum involving the notions of ââ¬Ëone and ââ¬Ëthreeââ¬â¢. â⬠(89) Yahya further claims that Al-Kindi misused technical terms When it came to Yahyaââ¬â¢s discussion of the Christian doctrinal formulae, he found that Al-Kindi misinterpreted and misused technical terms that were comprised in it. Yahya also clarifies that God is said to be ââ¬Ëoneââ¬â¢ in number in reference to his ââ¬Ësubstanceââ¬â¢. Griffith goes forth to say that Yahya goes to considerable lengths to dispose of what he considers to be logically faulty definitions of the ââ¬Ëoneââ¬â¢. Yahya describes God of having three attributes which are goodness/generosity, wisdom, and power. When Yahya responds to other philosophers challenging his treatise, he speaks of the three divine attributes One philosopher in particular who challenged Yahyaââ¬â¢s philosophy on the unity and trinity of God was al-Kindi. Al-Kindiââ¬â¢s reasoning for this was that he wanted to ââ¬Å"challenge Christians for the unreasonableness of their al-talit on the foundation of ââ¬Å"logic and philosophy, and more specifically on the grounds that their Trinitarian confession necessarlily involved the repulsive idea of introducing ââ¬Å"composition (al-tarkib) into the God headâ⬠To sum up Al-Kindiââ¬â¢s response, he believed that the God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit were not eternal. Griffith then describes Yahyaââ¬â¢s reaction to this by stating that ââ¬Å"Yahya argues that given the Muslim philosopherââ¬â¢s own description of God as simultaneously God as ââ¬Ëoneââ¬â¢ and as ââ¬Ësubstanceââ¬â¢, al ââ¬âKindi too faced a logical conundrum involving the notions of ââ¬Ëone and three. ;â⬠Griffith also affirms that Yahya further found that al-Kindi misinterpreted and misused technical terms that were comprised in his argument about the unity of God. Griffith explains that Yahya asserts that ââ¬Å" God is said to be ââ¬Ëoneââ¬â¢ in number in reference to his ââ¬Ësubstance, while in reference to his ââ¬Ëquiddityââ¬â¢ or whatnessââ¬â¢, which, according to Yahya, is essentially described as being ââ¬Ëgenerous/good, ââ¬Ëwiseââ¬â¢, and ââ¬Ëpowerefulââ¬â¢, he is ââ¬Ëthreeââ¬â¢Ã¢â¬ This paper will demonstrate how two critics have formed and expressed their own understandings of Yahyaââ¬â¢s treatise on unity and trinity of God. How yahya responds to other scholars attributes on his treatise. Many philosophers challenged Yahya Ibn Adi on his treatise on the unity and trinity of God. In Emilio Plattiââ¬â¢s article, he critques how Yahya refutes to others about their attributions to his own works. This paper will demonstrate how two critics have formed and expressed their own understandings of Yahyaââ¬â¢s treatise on unity and trinity of God. How yahya responds to other scholars attributes on his treatise. Many philosophers challenged Yahya Ibn Adi on his treatise on the unity and trinity of God. In Emilio Plattiââ¬â¢s article, he critques how Yahya refutes to others about their attributions to his own works. In conclusion, it is evident that there are many ways to interpret Yahya Ibn Adiââ¬â¢s treatises on the unity and trinity of God. There are also numerous ways one can interpret how Yahya refuted back to his own critiques. Griffith and Pratti are two critics who certainly had similar interpretations of Yahyaââ¬â¢s refutations.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.